Back to Archive

Issue №3 2018

[full article] - PDF

https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2018/3-3/12 

 

UDC 101.1::316.3-05:62

I. Muratova, Dr. Ph. (Philosophical), Associate Professor

National technical university of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv polytechnic institute", Kyiv, Ukraine

e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., ORCID 0000-0001-6203-4300

 

SOCIAL INTERACTION AND RELATIONSHIPS OF INDIVIDUALS IN THE COMPOSITION OF TECHNOLOGY

 

The purpose of the article is to reveal technology as a human activity in which people engage in such interaction with each other and build such relationships and social ties that are mediated by technical means and ensures success in the process of realizing a common goal. To overcome the limitations of narrowly specialized ideas about technology, the research is based on the scientific methods and theoretical principles of social philosophy. This approach allows us to understand technology as a universal principle of social practice, not just production. The need for a philosophical reflection of the immanent connection that exists between technology and sociality is proved by the author. Therefore, the author offers understanding of technology as unity of scientific and technical means and forms of social interactions in subjective practice and objectification human intentions and goals. The results of such research contribute to the establishment of the scientific and theoretical foundations of the practice of management of innovations and technologies with the purpose of conscious humanistic direction of scientific and technological progress.

Keywords: technology, society, social relations, interaction and relations of individuals, science, knowledge, cognition, technical means. 

 

References:

 

1. Michelfelder D., Newberry B., Zhu Q. 2017. Philosophy and engineering : exploring boundaries, expanding connections / Editors: Diane P Michelfelder; Byron Newberry; Qin Zhu // Philosophy of engineering and technology, Volume 26. – Switzerland: Springer, 266 p. [Electronic resource]. Mode of access: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45193-0

2. Tidwell, A. S. D., & Smith, J. M., 2015. Morals, Materials, and Technoscience. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40 (5), 687–711. doi:10.1177/0162243915577632

3. Ford, M. Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future / Martin Ford. – New York: Basic Books. 352 p. [Electronic resource]. Mode of access: https://www.uc.pt/feuc/citcoimbra/Martin_Ford-Rise_of_the_Robots

4. Virgillito, M. E., 2017. Rise of the robots: technology and the threat of a jobless future. // Labor History, 58 (2): 240-242. [Electronic resource]. Mode of access: https://doi.org/10.1080/0023656x.2016.1242716

5. Thompson, P.B., 2017. Resistance to risky technology: When are our environmental fears justified? / Paul B. Thompson // In: David M. Kaplan, ed., Philosophy, Technology, and the Environment. – Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: MIT Press, 63-81. [Electronic resource]. Mode of access: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035668.003.0005

6. Besomi, D., 1999. Harrod on the classification of technological progress. The origin of a wild-goose chase. BNL Quarterly Review, 208, 95–118. [Electronic resource]. Mode of access : http://economia.unipv.it/harrod/sec-lit/besomi/bnlqr99.pdf

7. Knyazev, V. N., 1990. Chelovek i tekhnologiya (sotsial'nofilosofskiy aspekt). Kyiv: Lybid, 175.

8. Rozin, V. M., 2006. Ponyatie i covpemennye kontseptsii texniki [The concept and the contemporary conceptions of technology]. Moscow: RAS IPh., 255.

9. Rozin, V. M., 2012. Tekhnika i sotsial'nost'. Filosofskiye razlicheniya i kontseptsii. Moscow: Librokom, 304.

10. Rozin, V. M., 2016. Tekhnika i tekhnologiya: ot kamennykh orudiy do Interneta i robotov. Yoshkar-Ola: Povolzhskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnologicheskiy universitet, 280.

11. Kroes P., 2012. Technical artefacts: creations of mind and matter. Dordrecht / Heidelberg / New York / London, Springer Publ., 280.

12. Gorokhov, V. G., 2012. Texnicheckie nauki: ictoriya i teoriya (ictoriya nayki c filocofckoy tochki zreniya). [Technical sciences: History and theory (the history of science from the point of view of philosophy)]. Moscow: Logos.

13. Ivanov, B. I., & Cheshev, V. V., 2010. Stanovleniye i razvitiye tekhnicheskikh nauk [The emergence and development of technical sciences]. Moscow: URSS, 264.

14. Stiegler, B., 1998. Technics and Time, 1 The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford California: Stanford University Press, 316. 

 

Corresponding author: I. Muratova

Copyright © 2018 Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv University Publishing