Back to Archive

Issue №1 2017

[full article] - PDF (language - ukrainian)


UDC 172.4

Denis Kiryukhin

Skovoroda's Institute of Philosophy, The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine



 This article demonstrates that the option of reciprocity and reconciliation is preserved even in the situation that might be called a manifestation of radical evil. The resolution of the acute crisis of human and intercultural relations manifested in tragic events, such as the Holocaust or the genocides, lies in reciprocity through forgiveness, on the one side, and in reciprocity through justice (ethical equality of the conflicting parties), on the other side. Obviously, this is an extremely complicated and hardly realizable task in the decades to come. However, we have no alternative to solving this problem. Reciprocity, in the broadest sense of the word, as our obligation towards the other to return to them the advantages they give to us, is one of the basic prerequisites of the very possibility of social cooperation. The discussion of ways of reconciliation — especially in the legal aspect — is more typical for Western European culture based on the tradition of Christianity. Nevertheless, this does not mean that there are no possibilities for reconciliation in Islam, Confucianism, or in any other cultural or religious traditions. Therefore, it is extremely important in the globalizing world firstly to study and to update knowledge on the various "reconciliation cultures" represented in various traditions and ethoses, and secondly to look for opportunities for reconciliation understood as peaceful coexistence and accommodation of superficially warring positions and cultural and religious concepts.

 Keywords: reciprocity, reconciliation, forgiveness, Kant, Rawls.



1. Buchanan A. "Critique of Justice as Reciprocity". In Contemporary Political Theory. A Reader, edited by C. Farrelly, 99-107. London: SAGE Publication2004.

2. Forst R. The Right to Justification. Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press2012.

3. Looney A. Vladimir Jankélévitch. The Time of Forgiveness. New York: Fordham University Press2015.

4. Mobekk E. "Transitional Justice in Post-Conflict Societies – Approaches to Reconciliation". In After Intervention: Public Security Management in Post-Conflict Societies - From Intervention to Sustainable Local Ownership, edited by A. Ebnother and P. Fluri, 261-293. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces2005.

5. Murphy C. Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2010.

6. Roermund B. Van. "Rubbing Off and Rubbing On: The Grammar of Reconciliation". In Lethe"s Law: Justice, Law and Ethics in Reconciliation, edited by E.Chirtodoulidis and S.Veitch, 175-192. Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing2001.

7. Schaap A. Political Reconciliation. London, New York: Routledge2005.

8. The Golden Rule. The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religious, edited by J.Neusner and B.Chilton. – London, New York: Continuum, 2008.

9. Tutu D. No Future without Forgiveness: A personal overview of South Africa’s truth and reconciliation commission. London: Rider Books1999.

10. Young I.M. "Asymmetrical Reciprocity On Moral Respect Wonder and Enlarged Thought". In Judgment, Imagination, and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt, edited by R.Beiner and J.Nedelsky, 205-229. Rowman &Littlefield2001.


Corresponding author: Denis Kiryukhin

Copyright © 201Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv University Publishing